Thanks for the inspiration, awakening for the 2nd time in my 29 years of life.
I will be on the front line right along side my fellow man.
End the Fed.
Praise god
To me, it actually doesn’t have anything to do with pacifism at all. It’s a question of whether or not it is tactically viable, within a given situation. As the guy in this video says, fuck purity. I am not here for moksha; not in this lifetime, at least. If that is what you are here for, you’re on the wrong planet, at the current time.
David Icke has explained it. The cabal are going to have a scenario where all of the police and military etc are in place. Fighting them on their own terms, as largely unarmed civilians, will simply not be viable. Whoever tries, will simply be killed.
Although what I said about not being here for the sake of enlightenment is true, there are also spiritual reasons why employing violence in this scenario is not a good idea. We are not fighting a primarily corporeal enemy within this conflict; we are fighting a spiritual and energetic one, which is contagious, and violence and the accompanying emotions are fairly simply the vectors by which it spreads. Think of their form of evil as a disease; if you’re violent, you will become infected, in the same way that while AIDS isn’t aerosol contagious, it spreads in specific ways.
It’s fairly simply about choosing the correct tool for the job, on a purely pragmatic basis. If I thought violence was going to work, I’d advocate it. Do your own analysis of the situation, however, and I’m confident that you will come up with the same answer. There are times when pacifism is not the correct tactical card to play, and other times when it is. Right now, is one of the times when it is.
Take a look here http://neithercorp.blogspot.com/ well written, educated essays on all our (tho it’s US centric) situation. Here is mentioned the ‘willfully ignorant’ is the ‘second most dangerous’ individual. Elitists being the first. Time for real change people. Good luck to you all!
The Canadian governments best friends at the g20 were the black block, they gave it all the ammunition it needed to infringe on our rights and freedoms!
@: from reviewing the videos of the one police car which was burnt in an intersection, a number of things stand out:
1. First, the car was brought in under protection of a formation of cops. The cops then walked slowly backward, leaving the car unprotected, and backed down the street where they went into another formation. Their action was unopposed and was so smooth as if they were choreographed, at no time was there panic or breaking of formation on the cops’ part.
2. Second, people came up to the car and smashed its windows out, and one person opened the hood, but no one opened the trunk. Police cars tend to be rolling arsenals and should be expected to cook off the ammo in the trunk; this includes tear gas and the like.
3. The most interesting bit: some guy came up and held a cigarette lighter to the driver’s side seat. Immediately the cloth began to burn brightly, and soon the inside of the entire car was on fire. This includes the back seat, which in most police cars is a hard plastic bench, not upholstery, to facilitate hosing out of various bodily fluids which might be left there. Numerous secondary explosions could be seen inside the car. Oddly enough the air bags (powered by pressurized CO2) did not appear to fire – they’d have a tendency to knock down the fire temporarily. Perhaps they’d been removed. Also, there was no indication of ammo or trunk contents cooking off (exploding), nor did the gas tank explode.
I think that these police cars are analogous to “bait cars” (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bait_car) used by police to capture car thieves, except these cars were prepared to catch anarchists and the like, and to provide a propaganda casus belli for violent action by cops against other elements of the demonstration. It looks like accelerants were somehow placed in the seats so the fire would spread quickly and do a complete burn of the car – this might account for the secondary explosions/flares observed. It also looks like the airbags and any ammunition were removed, and the gas tank may have been nearly empty. Finally, most police cars are equipped with communications equipment and computers, and from what I could see in the video, these appeared to be missing…
@cveitch hay i was trying to give a suggestion to the site but forgot my account but i’ll make another 1, actually this is a suggestion as well as a point, i would love next time there are the people in black doing the damage “not the cops, the so called anarchist” could you get someone to follow them or interview them, reasons for when then went the unmarked cops came in “just think maybe they are the same people” Please would be so cool to catch them out.
Its like it was said that the cars where left for awhile then the men in black came to cause the trouble when there was no one else on the vid doing it until after they started it, hummmm
referring to G20 Toronto – Press For Truth Video Report
Note: If you do not receive the subscription confirmation email within five minutes of subscribing, please check your junk mail folder. Make sure to mark the sender as safe, to avoid further updates from being labelled as junk.
Thanks for the inspiration, awakening for the 2nd time in my 29 years of life.
I will be on the front line right along side my fellow man.
End the Fed.
Praise god
To me, it actually doesn’t have anything to do with pacifism at all. It’s a question of whether or not it is tactically viable, within a given situation. As the guy in this video says, fuck purity. I am not here for moksha; not in this lifetime, at least. If that is what you are here for, you’re on the wrong planet, at the current time.
David Icke has explained it. The cabal are going to have a scenario where all of the police and military etc are in place. Fighting them on their own terms, as largely unarmed civilians, will simply not be viable. Whoever tries, will simply be killed.
Although what I said about not being here for the sake of enlightenment is true, there are also spiritual reasons why employing violence in this scenario is not a good idea. We are not fighting a primarily corporeal enemy within this conflict; we are fighting a spiritual and energetic one, which is contagious, and violence and the accompanying emotions are fairly simply the vectors by which it spreads. Think of their form of evil as a disease; if you’re violent, you will become infected, in the same way that while AIDS isn’t aerosol contagious, it spreads in specific ways.
It’s fairly simply about choosing the correct tool for the job, on a purely pragmatic basis. If I thought violence was going to work, I’d advocate it. Do your own analysis of the situation, however, and I’m confident that you will come up with the same answer. There are times when pacifism is not the correct tactical card to play, and other times when it is. Right now, is one of the times when it is.
Hi guys..
Take a look here http://neithercorp.blogspot.com/ well written, educated essays on all our (tho it’s US centric) situation. Here is mentioned the ‘willfully ignorant’ is the ‘second most dangerous’ individual. Elitists being the first. Time for real change people. Good luck to you all!
Peace and love to you all without exception!
rx
The Canadian governments best friends at the g20 were the black block, they gave it all the ammunition it needed to infringe on our rights and freedoms!
Do not swallow bait offered by the enemy. Sun Tzu – Art of War
@: from reviewing the videos of the one police car which was burnt in an intersection, a number of things stand out:
1. First, the car was brought in under protection of a formation of cops. The cops then walked slowly backward, leaving the car unprotected, and backed down the street where they went into another formation. Their action was unopposed and was so smooth as if they were choreographed, at no time was there panic or breaking of formation on the cops’ part.
2. Second, people came up to the car and smashed its windows out, and one person opened the hood, but no one opened the trunk. Police cars tend to be rolling arsenals and should be expected to cook off the ammo in the trunk; this includes tear gas and the like.
3. The most interesting bit: some guy came up and held a cigarette lighter to the driver’s side seat. Immediately the cloth began to burn brightly, and soon the inside of the entire car was on fire. This includes the back seat, which in most police cars is a hard plastic bench, not upholstery, to facilitate hosing out of various bodily fluids which might be left there. Numerous secondary explosions could be seen inside the car. Oddly enough the air bags (powered by pressurized CO2) did not appear to fire – they’d have a tendency to knock down the fire temporarily. Perhaps they’d been removed. Also, there was no indication of ammo or trunk contents cooking off (exploding), nor did the gas tank explode.
I think that these police cars are analogous to “bait cars” (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bait_car) used by police to capture car thieves, except these cars were prepared to catch anarchists and the like, and to provide a propaganda casus belli for violent action by cops against other elements of the demonstration. It looks like accelerants were somehow placed in the seats so the fire would spread quickly and do a complete burn of the car – this might account for the secondary explosions/flares observed. It also looks like the airbags and any ammunition were removed, and the gas tank may have been nearly empty. Finally, most police cars are equipped with communications equipment and computers, and from what I could see in the video, these appeared to be missing…
@cveitch hay i was trying to give a suggestion to the site but forgot my account but i’ll make another 1, actually this is a suggestion as well as a point, i would love next time there are the people in black doing the damage “not the cops, the so called anarchist” could you get someone to follow them or interview them, reasons for when then went the unmarked cops came in “just think maybe they are the same people” Please would be so cool to catch them out.
Its like it was said that the cars where left for awhile then the men in black came to cause the trouble when there was no one else on the vid doing it until after they started it, hummmm
referring to G20 Toronto – Press For Truth Video Report
Notice some other guy did a dedication to our charlie so i have jumped on the band wagon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAFKjNgBu58
Much love